Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hurried Proposal: Super-Mutants

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

This got me thinking. Is it fair to revise a hurried proposal after
receiving support for it? Those who supported before might not what to
support the revision.

Also, does this have any effect? It doesn't change the game state in anyway.


- Hose

On Jan 1, 2008 5:16 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hmmm, in order to avoid a problem with mutations in future nweeks for
> individuals who do not mutate this nweek...
>
> I revise Proposal 255 (Super-Mutants) to read:
> {
> Upon adoption of this Proposal, all Players, regardless of whether or not
> they have already Mutated this nweek, are allowed to Mutate once during
> nweek 136 before casting any Votes. This proposal takes precedence over
> Rule
> 61.
> }
>
> I also point out that if one more person supports this Hurrying in the
> next
> 2 hours, we might actually get to mutate again before ballotday.
>
> Billy Pilgrim
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss