Re: [s-d] Loopholes, scamming, etc.

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 31, 2007 3:15 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Would the cleanup be any more involved than a Refresh Proposal or
> dictatorial decree to the effect of "the gamestate becomes what it
> was at <time just before the scam>, with the exception that Hose
> keeps his scam win"?
>
>
The current rules would do the required cleanup. Also, I'm willing to sell
the formula for a juicy amount of macks as I don't necessarily want to do
it. Maybe we do need some contract law as I would like to be assured payment
if the buyer wins.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss