Roger Hicks on Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:15:37 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Usurpation |
On Dec 31, 2007 12:08 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Dec 31, 2007 2:02 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Possible, but it should be a rare occurrence. It will cost 50 points > > to usurp a ministry unless it has been held for a while....that's no > > small amount. > > > > > If the retainer gets low, it becomes quite easy and there is absolutely no > incentive for a Minister to up that amount. Why would I spend points to up > the retainer for the privilege of doing paperwork? > This was intentional so we would get some turnover in the ministries. At present, if no one takes action by spending points, all ministries will auto-vacate every 5 nweeks. Recall that up until now they were auto-vacating every nweek. > When it is high, it is too difficult to usurp when needed. Let's say that > the Gamble Votes proposal passes this nweek and I no longer want to do the > paperwork required for the MoC. I could be a nice guy and vacate the > ministry, but I could also be a PITA, declare that I'm not going to do the > work, and force someone to spend 40 points to usurp me. > A minister who fails to perform their obligated duties within a jiffy is auto-vacated from their ministry. No need for anyone to spend points. BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss