Mike McGann on Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:52:41 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Usurpation


On Dec 31, 2007 12:47 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Though it is by now futile to do so, I object on the grounds that pikhq is
> attempting to usurp using an obsolete mechanism that has remained in the
> rules through proposal parsing mishaps and will soon vanish via Mr. Fixit.
> Try again when the retainer is actually defined/important.
>

Which is exactly the reason why I don't like the new retainer system. If you
have the points, you can usurp without any objections no matter what. I only
voted for Mr. Fixit because it was the will of B, not me.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss