Re: [s-d] [s-b] some Consultation assignment

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

You're right. I should have had my Oracularity include the change
explicitly. That said, if the change is determined to have taken place by
the yes answer, does that not mean that the public display of rules has
simply been incorrect since the start of the nweek (i.e. the amendment
should happen anyway)?

It's interesting to think about for the future, but in this case I think the
issue is moot. Mr. Fixit will in all likelihood take care of this before the
consultation becomes pondered.

Billy Pilgrim


On 12/31/07, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is answered Yes, so after it becomes Pondered, does it have any
> effect
> on the gamestate except for the Oracularity? With the previous text of
> "Pondered Consultations shall guide further interpretation of the Rules",
> I
> would say that the amendment would have to be performed, but now it seems
> that the whole Justice system comes down to the Oracularity, the Yes or No
> answer doesn't really matter.
>
> - Hose
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss