| Mike McGann on Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:49:07 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix the Shelves |
On Dec 30, 2007 9:23 PM, ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Shall we Hurry this one, then? Maybe submit a Consultation as to the > equivalence of FOR and YES, too (I seem to be unable to access the > Rules currently, so I don't know how long before an Oracularity goes > into effect). <http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss> > I say no. It isn't that critical and can be fixed with a standard Proposal. I believe we should reserve hurried votes for critical issues like side effects caused by last nweeks proposals or the loss of the MoS. Hurrying does create a bunch of extra paperwork and if I don't want to see it used too much. - Hose _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss