Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamble Votes

Roger Hicks on Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:02:39 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamble Votes

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamble Votes
From: "Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:02:34 -0700
In-reply-to: <33dd05c30712310113s5eb117acxe1be73ecb4295cef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <56732cfd0712302235o5027c5ceo3332a3a954a8eed7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650712302244u3b8df8f3j58d33d46ff90cacc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <33dd05c30712310113s5eb117acxe1be73ecb4295cef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Dec 31, 2007 2:13 AM, Aaron Coquet <farfromunique@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> so, on a 5 or a 6, that vote counts as... what? no vote? roll again?
>
>
On 5 or 6 it is a vote of GAMBLE, which has no effect upon a
proposal's strength.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamble Votes
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamble Votes
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamble Votes
  - From: Aaron Coquet

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation reassignment
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix the Shelves
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamble Votes
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamble Votes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread