William Berard on Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:22:50 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Action: Dictatorship of the Proletariat or quick fix to the Emergency. |
On 12/12/07, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > comex wrote: > > On 12/12/07, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> It's actually unambiguous. If a majority of PEPs believe that Rule 1-10 > >> self-ratifies to fix itself, then it did. We can get on with the game. > >> > > > > I would not proceed with a gamestate unless it was sufficiently > > unambiguous that nearly everyone agrees that it is correct. However, > > I would not be surprised in this case if you had several objectors. > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-discuss mailing list > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > > > There haven't been any objectors since I illegally took the action of > revising the rule. > The problem is Agora's child did sumbit a similar illegal-but-accepted tweak. which one is going to really happen then? _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss