Re: [s-d] Grand Chancellor?

[comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007 20:10:44 Mike McGann wrote:
> > And, I'm going out for a beer unless that action is declared invalid.
> >
> > - Hose
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2007 10:09 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Dec 11, 2007 10:04 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > How could you possibly interpret 1-10 otherwise?
> > >
> > > I read it as:
> > >
> > > You have 1 nday to declare an action to be invalid.
> > > After 1 nday, the action is valid no matter what.
> > >
> > > I don't see where it takes 1 nday to be valid. If so, then nobody is
> > > the Minister of anything because all Ministries vacated at the end
> > > of the
>
> nweek,
>
> > > clock was off, and 1 nday could never elapse.
> > >
> > > - Hose
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
> I declare your act of writing to the business forum invalid, unless
> Codae is not the Grand Chancellor.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business


I declare your bottom posting annoying.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss