| Mike McGann on Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:09:35 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] Grand Chancellor? |
On Dec 11, 2007 10:04 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > How could you possibly interpret 1-10 otherwise? > > I read it as: You have 1 nday to declare an action to be invalid. After 1 nday, the action is valid no matter what. I don't see where it takes 1 nday to be valid. If so, then nobody is the Minister of anything because all Ministries vacated at the end of the nweek, clock was off, and 1 nday could never elapse. - Hose _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss