Re: [s-d] RFC: Admissions reorg

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:

> On Dec 11, 2007 9:39 AM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 12/11/07, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Any Human External Force may request to join the game by posting a
>>> message to a Public Forum containing a request to become a Player  
>>> and
>>> a uniquely identifying name that e wishes to be known by.
>> Any Human External Force may, with 2 supporters and without 2
>> objections, become a Player? ;)
>
> Should we include "who is not already a Player" to avoid claims that a
> single Human can be more than one Player?

Good point.

>>> Renumber rule 1-9 to 1-6, rule 1-6 to 1-8, and rule 1-8 to 1-9.
>> Eek.
>
> Yeah, as long as the order of the rules doesn't explicitly determine
> precedence, I think reordering the rules just makes the history ugly.

Well, I didn't really want to stick it at the end of the section,  
because I wanted it near the rest, but overwriting a previously used  
number messes with the history as well. Is there a better way to do  
this?

-- 
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss