Re: [s-d] stupid question

Ed Murphy on Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:18:08 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] stupid question

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] stupid question
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:13:29 -0800
In-reply-to: <cf0c2a990712110306x7b602e2cx63fbb0b99c86acee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <475E6E62.6090701@xxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990712110306x7b602e2cx63fbb0b99c86acee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Wooble wrote:

> On Dec 11, 2007 6:02 AM, Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I'm having trouble following the
>> rapidly evolving gamestate.
>> Are we in emergency or not ?
> 
> As far as I can tell, yes.  I believe there exist at minimum 5 Panic
> Buttons that are unambiguously On at the moment.

Per my unofficial records, Billy Pilgrim, Codae, Hose, pikhq, Wonko,
you, and probably BobTHJ (if "press" without explicit context is
interpreted as "hit" rather than "toggle").

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] stupid question
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta
- Re: [s-d] stupid question
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] meta-proposal: a theoretical framework for ending the Emergency without waiting
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Not a Proposal: Dependence Day
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] stupid question
Next by thread: [s-d] RFC: Admissions reorg
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread