Re: [s-d] [s-b] meta-proposal: a theoretical framework for ending the Emergency without waiting

["William Berard" <william.berard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/11/07, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 7:37 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Consider this:
> >
> > Some Player announces in the Public Forum that he is, as a Game
> > Action, changing the beginning of the 1st paragraph of Rule 1-10 to
> > read "Any player (as a Game Action) may, with 2 support, declare any
> > Game Action which has occurred within the past NDay to be Invalid".
> >
> > We all agree not to declare this patently illegal game action Invalid
> > within the next nday.  We also all agree to adopt a Refresh Proposal
> > harshly punishing anyone who does declare this action Invalid.
> >
> > Tomorrow night at 0:00 UTC, Rule 1-10 automatically ratifies the
> > change to itself, we all turn our panic buttons off, and live happily
> > ever after.
> >
> I would support this plan of action.
>
> BobTHJ


So would I, although by the scope of some RP draft we get, some people
might be eager to put forward proposals to change other parts of the
ruleset (playerhood, panic buttons, and so on...)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss