Re: [s-d] About panics

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I guess the only part of the game that really needs to be kept working is the proposals/voting system.  If we take great pains to protect it, then instead of a panic, we can just elect a dictator to save us.  Of course, it'll probably take longer with regard to nweeks, but as long as people can reach Quorum (and proposals can affect the gamestate), we should be relatively safe.  I'm not saying it's the best way, but it might work.

By the way, why are we panicking?

Codae


----- Original Message ----
From: Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 8:09:14 PM
Subject: Re: [s-d] About panics

On Dec 10, 2007 7:29 PM, Aaron Coquet <farfromunique@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Why are we panicking again? This is silly.
> First off, I think that part of the reason we're in a panic is that we
> discovered that we have Buttons that we can activate, and so we're
> trying out ways of activating them. Consider the following:
>

Interesting. Let's Repeal Rule 0.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss