Ed Murphy on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:01:56 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Murphy's refresh proto |
Aaron C wrote: > I don't like this part. Since when do we explain ourselves in the body > of the rules? > >> Regularity of communication being essential for the healthy >> function of any nomic, it is hereby resolved: Since when do we have a rule saying we can't? Anyway, that bit (and in fact that entire rule) can be left out without affecting the major intent of the RP, which is to do away with Panic Buttons. In addition to ambiguity of terms, the emergency procedure shouldn't depend on a general framework (objects) defined by other rules. For instance, imagine a rule that continuously destroyed all objects owned by players. The current Rule 0 would re-create Panic Buttons just as quickly, but in an Off state, so you couldn't create or maintain a State Of Emergency. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss