Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Paperwork Reduction Act

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

True, but it is worded that the Oracle is not required to do so. If it
does make a point, the Oracle can record it. And if someone is
passionate about recording a ZOTTED consultation that the Oracle
chooses to not record, he is more than welcome to enter the record
himself.

- Hose

On Dec 8, 2007 7:43 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Spammy consultations do sometimes make a point, though (in the case that
> they are not frivolous). You are right about them being in the mailing list,
> however. What if consultations gained numbers when either assigned to a
> priest or zotted, but full records (what you get when you click on full
> info, off the justice page on the wiki) didn't need to be kept. simply a
> note of number, question, and zotting, and if the MoQ is feeling generous a
> link to mailing list archive?
>
> Billy Pilgrim
>
>
> On Dec 8, 2007 7:37 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Everything is still in the record of the mailing list. Spammy and/or
> > frivolous consultations don't have any lasting effect on the game so
> > they don't really need to be officially recorded.
> >
> > - Hose
> >
> > On Dec 8, 2007 7:26 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I like the part about gaining a number when assigned to a priest, but I
> > > still think the consultations should be recorded even when frivolous
> > and/or
> > > spammy. And I think this despite feeling your pain, 0x44... I did quit
> > the
> > > ministry ;-)
> > >
> > > Billy Pilgrim
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 8, 2007 4:38 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh man, after these couple ndays as MoQ, you've got my vote.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 0x44;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike McGann wrote:
> > > > > I submit the following Proposal titled the "Paperwork Reduction
> > Act":
> > > > >
> > > > > {{
> > > > > Amend Rule 2-5 by replacing the following text under the
> > > > > "Consultations" heading:
> > > > > {{
> > > > > Consultations automatically gain a Consultation Number upon
> > submission.
> > > > > }}
> > > > > with
> > > > > {{
> > > > > Consultations automatically gain a Consultation Number when assigned
> > > > > to a Priest.
> > > > > }}
> > > > >
> > > > > Amend Rule 2-5 by adding the following text under the "ZOTTING"
> > > > > heading to the end of the first paragraph:
> > > > > {{
> > > > > If a Consultation is ZOTTED by the Oracle before he assigns it to a
> > > > > Priest, the Oracle is not required to record the Consultation in the
> > > > > Public Display.
> > > > > }}
> > > > > }}
> > > > >
> > > > > - Hose
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > spoon-business mailing list
> > > > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss