Jamie Dallaire on Sat, 8 Dec 2007 17:26:58 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Paperwork Reduction Act |
I like the part about gaining a number when assigned to a priest, but I still think the consultations should be recorded even when frivolous and/or spammy. And I think this despite feeling your pain, 0x44... I did quit the ministry ;-) Billy Pilgrim On Dec 8, 2007 4:38 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Oh man, after these couple ndays as MoQ, you've got my vote. > > -- > 0x44; > > > > Mike McGann wrote: > > I submit the following Proposal titled the "Paperwork Reduction Act": > > > > {{ > > Amend Rule 2-5 by replacing the following text under the > > "Consultations" heading: > > {{ > > Consultations automatically gain a Consultation Number upon submission. > > }} > > with > > {{ > > Consultations automatically gain a Consultation Number when assigned > > to a Priest. > > }} > > > > Amend Rule 2-5 by adding the following text under the "ZOTTING" > > heading to the end of the first paragraph: > > {{ > > If a Consultation is ZOTTED by the Oracle before he assigns it to a > > Priest, the Oracle is not required to record the Consultation in the > > Public Display. > > }} > > }} > > > > - Hose > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-business mailing list > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss