Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Paperwork Reduction Act

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

I like the part about gaining a number when assigned to a priest, but I
still think the consultations should be recorded even when frivolous and/or
spammy. And I think this despite feeling your pain, 0x44... I did quit the
ministry ;-)

Billy Pilgrim

On Dec 8, 2007 4:38 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Oh man, after these couple ndays as MoQ, you've got my vote.
>
> --
> 0x44;
>
>
>
> Mike McGann wrote:
> > I submit the following Proposal titled the "Paperwork Reduction Act":
> >
> > {{
> > Amend Rule 2-5 by replacing the following text under the
> > "Consultations" heading:
> > {{
> > Consultations automatically gain a Consultation Number upon submission.
> > }}
> > with
> > {{
> > Consultations automatically gain a Consultation Number when assigned
> > to a Priest.
> > }}
> >
> > Amend Rule 2-5 by adding the following text under the "ZOTTING"
> > heading to the end of the first paragraph:
> > {{
> > If a Consultation is ZOTTED by the Oracle before he assigns it to a
> > Priest, the Oracle is not required to record the Consultation in the
> > Public Display.
> > }}
> > }}
> >
> > - Hose
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss