Josiah Worcester on Sat, 8 Dec 2007 16:14:18 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Accessorizing


On Saturday 08 December 2007 16:12:42 Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2007 5:06 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday 08 December 2007 15:03:20 Mike McGann wrote:
> > > On Dec 8, 2007 4:58 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If it's invalid, then all that's happening is that the action happens
> > outside
> > > > of B Nomic. It's quite valid in Agora, at least.
> > >
> > > For all I know, it could be quite valid in Pokemon as well. But we
> > > aren't playing Pokemon here.
> > >
> > > - Hose
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> > >
> >
> > Also, I fail to see what part of rule 5-1 it fails to meet.
> >
> 
> It doesn't explicitly describe how it's possible to change what
> parties are in the agreement.
> 
Fair 'nough.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss