Josiah Worcester on Sat, 8 Dec 2007 16:14:18 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Accessorizing |
On Saturday 08 December 2007 16:12:42 Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Dec 8, 2007 5:06 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Saturday 08 December 2007 15:03:20 Mike McGann wrote: > > > On Dec 8, 2007 4:58 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > If it's invalid, then all that's happening is that the action happens > > outside > > > > of B Nomic. It's quite valid in Agora, at least. > > > > > > For all I know, it could be quite valid in Pokemon as well. But we > > > aren't playing Pokemon here. > > > > > > - Hose > > > _______________________________________________ > > > spoon-discuss mailing list > > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > > > > > > > Also, I fail to see what part of rule 5-1 it fails to meet. > > > > It doesn't explicitly describe how it's possible to change what > parties are in the agreement. > Fair 'nough. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss