Mike McGann on Fri, 7 Dec 2007 05:21:38 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation |
I meant you could invalidate every action and be unable to stop it. I say all the above Consultations answer yes. It is permissible. But it only takes one Player to say, "Invalid!" and it is so. Immediately upon that claim, it didn't' happen--valid or not. The only recourse is to submit a malformed Consultation and you can always "Invalid!" the ZOT. Also, pressing panic buttons was not a Game Action, but the new rules does make it a Game Action. - Hose On Dec 6, 2007 11:00 PM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't think that's what Hose meant. By "Spamming claims against all > actions by calling them invalid may > deadlock the game" he meant that if we insist on calling a > Consultation for every game action, the game will never be able to > move forwards because we'll be too busy trying to sort all the > consultations. > > -- > Wonko > > > On Dec 6, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Josiah Worcester wrote: > > > I consult on: > > { > > Question: Is it permissible to make any game actions? > > Reasoning: None. > > } > > > > I consult on: > > { > > Question: Is it permissible to go into a state of emergency? > > Reasoning: None. > > } > > > > I consult on: > > { > > Question: Is it permissible to answer a consultation? > > Reasoning: None. > > } > > [ These consultations dead-lock the game, according to consultation > > 63. ] > > I turn on my panic button. > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-business mailing list > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss