Re: [s-d] Answer to Consultation 63

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

I do recommend hoisting the Jolly Roger.

- Hose

On Dec 6, 2007 10:44 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > {
> > Question:  Should the above Consultations, based on the Rules, be ZOTTED?
> > Reasoning:  The format is explicitly condoned in Rule 1-10, but the format
> > also appears malformed (to the Supplicant).
> > Unbeliever: BobTHJ
> > }
> >
>
> Note that this answer applies to the above Consultations being
> Consultations 59, 60, 61, 62 and not to any other Consultations that
> may be located above this one in other Public Displays.
>
> I answer Yes.
>
> Reasoning:
> Rule 2-5 states that a Consultation must be a question that permits a
> yes or no reply. While the statement could be asserted, in an awkward
> way, to be true or false, it is not a question and should be ZOTTED.
> Spamming claims against all actions by calling them invalid may
> deadlock the game so I don't recommend doing that.
>
> - Priest Hose
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss