Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Duties as Obligations

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

I like the idea in general, and the obligation framework. A few minor
comments below:

On Dec 6, 2007 11:25 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In the rule titled "Official Quantities" and the term rdays is defined
> in the ruleset add the following to the list:


I think you're missing an "if" somewhere in there.


> Also, re-write the section "Automatic Reassignment" to read:
> {{
> Any Priest which has not answered a consultation he has been assigned
> to within a Jiffy ceases to be the Priest for that Consultation.
> }}


In coordination with the provision above this one, would it be wise to make
the MoQ reassign a new priest in such cases in a shorter timespan than a
jiffy?

Billy Pilgrim


>
>
> In the rule titled "Public Displays" append the text:
> {{
> If the rules require a Ministry to maintain a public display, then
> that Ministry is obligated to update that public display to reflect
> the current gamestate whenever the data related to is is modified.
> However, this obligation is fulfilled even if there are accidental
> errors and/or omissions in the updated data of the public display.
>
> Any player may challenge a public display that is maintained by a
> Ministry as a Game Action by listing any errors he believes to be
> present in that public display. The Minister who maintains that
> display is obligated to address those errors by either correcting them
> or indicating why he believes them to be already correct.
> }}
> }
>
> BobTHJ
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss