Re: [s-d] [s-b] Dice Master

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hmmmm.... I'm not sure you guys can actually do that. I have a proposal
pending right now that would allow such delayed game actions, but as far as
I know you can't do it yet. Submit again when the emergency is over/when the
first consultation is pondered?

Billy Pilgrim

On Nov 30, 2007 2:23 PM, Aaron Coquet <farfromunique@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> to lead into a second consultation.
>
> Once the previously submitted consultation is answered, I submit the
> following consultation:
> Is any email coming from the specified email address considered to be
> from the player to whom that email address is registered?
> --
> Aaron C, who thinks remailers are interesting
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 10:26 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I believe that regardless of whether the Dice Master is a Player it
> > is, in fact, a PEP, since who the Players are is unclear or ambiguous,
> > and it can be argued that the Dice Master could pass a Membership Test
> > comprised solely of being able to send and receive email messages (the
> > "any or all" problem in Rule 1-17), which was accepted as the basis
> > for the AFO's status as a Player in a Consultation (not yet Pondered,
> > but I think this still establishes the ambiguity), and it can further
> > be argued that the Registrar's refusal to allow the Dice Master to
> > become a Player is of ambiguous legality since the rules as written
> > seem to indicate that becoming a Player happens instantly when a
> > message requesting to do so is received in the Public Forum, making
> > the refusal by the Registrar in violation of the Temporal Prime
> > Directive.  The quantum interpretation of the relevant Consultation
> > (also not Pondered) on that point is probably itself ambiguous or
> > unclear.
> >
> > I submit as further evidence the existence of Refresh Proposals that
> > would deregister the Dice Master if it's a Player.  Why make such a
> > proposal if its status is not entirely unclear?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007 1:08 PM, Aaron Coquet <farfromunique@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > When the Pause ends, I submit the following consultation:
> > > Is it true that Dice Master is a player?
> > >
> > > Unbeliever: Aaron C
> > > Reasoning: according to text at the bottom of every message posted by
> > > Dice Master, there is a website with instructions on how to control
> > > the actions of Dice Master. This website also states that Dice Master
> > > is a computer program, which is a clone of another computer program.
> > > In the event that computer programs are allowed to be players, Dice
> > > Master is not a unique being, but rather a clone.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Aaron C
> > > "H. P. Lovecraft is Rock and Roll" -- Neil Gaiman
> > > Don't Panic!
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Geoffrey Spear
> > http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Aaron C
> "H. P. Lovecraft is Rock and Roll" -- Neil Gaiman
> Don't Panic!
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss