Mike McGann on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:14:01 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] BobTHJ's Refresh Proposal |
Quick thought that I will throw out even though people will probably not like it--would having a dedicated game master and judge be a good thing? Someone who isn't a player and doesn't have a stake in the game, that can rule on issues and change game state to fix things as they see fit. A flaw in any justice system that is composed of players is that they are always playing in the best interest of themselves. I'm not sure how it could effectively be implemented since it would put a huge dependency on one person. Just an idea. Also, I'm up for what Will said in just fixing state to make the game playable again, on the condition that people "behave" until we can fix any other outstanding issues through normal processes. I have a feeling that as things are now, Refresh Proposals that people "like" won't happen since they are starting to get too complex and are trying to fix too many things. - Hose _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss