Mike McGann on Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:12:50 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] BobTHJ's Refresh Proposal |
On Nov 26, 2007 2:57 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > { > All Proposals with a status of Open become Historical with a win-state > of Lost. No awards or penalties are assessed. Did you mean to say Pending? If so, I'm up for just throwing out every proposal for this nweek--no Historical with win-state of Lost to reduce paperwork. > All Consultations which are currently Waiting become Zotted. Just throw out as well to reduce paperwork. > The AFO becomes a player (if it is not one already). The AFO ceases to > be a Faction (if it is one). Can we just throw out the AFO as a Player for now and work with it after the restart since this was a heated debate? > The Registrar may cause any Player who has become a player within the > past 12 ndays to cease to be a Player with 2 Support. He must state > the reason for such action, which must be one of the following: > * The Player's name is ambiguous, unclear, or in conflict with the > name of an already existing Player > * The Registrar believes that the new Player is identical to an > already existing Player or Faction. > * The Player was previously denied playerhood for any valid > still-existant reason. > }} I say keep the first sentence, remove the rest but keeping "He must state the reason for such action". > In Rule 5-2 replace: > {{ > * The Agreement is not already a Faction > }} > with: > {{ > * The Agreement is not already a Faction or Player > }} I'm not a fan of the Faction stuff so I won't comment on this one. > Add the following rule to Section 1: > {{ > Whatever is not prohibited or regulated by a rule is permitted and > unregulated. However, for the purposes of this rule an action is > regulated if described by a rule. > }} This is the flaw in the original Suber ruleset and should not be added. - Hose _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss