Re: [s-d] [s-b] For the win

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 26, 2007 2:15 PM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On what grounds? Suber's original nomic ruleset had an explicit clause
> stating that whatever was not explicitly regulated or forbidden was
> implicitly permitted. We don't have such a clause - we repealed it
> years ago. And so, as in any other game, we're allowed to do whatever
> the rules say we can, and nothing else we do has any standing in the
> game.

Exactly. That is what I was trying to say, but you said it a more direct way.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss