Re: [s-d] [s-b] Concerning the AFO.

[Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sunday 25 November 2007 09:06:13 Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> pikhq:
> 
> You stated in a subsequent email that you "retract" all consultations. Was
> that intended to include this one submitted on behalf of the AFO? Shall I
> ZOT it?
> 
> Billy Pilgrim
> 
> On Nov 23, 2007 1:44 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I am afraid that, as is the case with the prior consultation submitted by
> > the AFO, I am unsure as to whether it is valid. I will await the 
settlement
> > and ponderation of Consultation 39 to assign a number and priest to this
> > consultation.
> >
> > Billy Pilgrim
> >
> >
> > On Nov 22, 2007 10:00 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > pikhq wrote:
> > >
> > > > It seems that in agora-discussion, I had one person support me joining
> > > the
> > > > AFO, and two people with conditional support for the same. . . The
> > > conditions
> > > > have been met, so I am a member of the AFO.
> > >
> > > This is correct; I missed that comex had supported it (it was worded as
> > > "I support the triply-quoted intent" and appeared in the midst of some
> > > other stuff not related to the AFO).
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> > >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

The AFO submitted this one, not me. I can't ask to retract it. Of course, by B 
Nomic's rules, I can't retract any.

I don't want this one ZOTed.


Why can't you do it like Agora? :p
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss