Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Undead, and other legal fictions

[0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Since no rule is created, that line is meaningless. I'll revise it 
again, I guess.

--
0x4461736864617368;



Mike McGann wrote:
> Yeah, what BobTHJ and Wooble said. And I think you should just remove
> the "This rule then repeals itself" as well since that would just
> cause all kinds of consultations.
>
> - Hose
>
> On Nov 24, 2007 3:54 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> On Nov 23, 2007 3:10 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>     
>>> On Nov 23, 2007 12:02 PM, 0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> {{
>>>>     Upon passage of this proposal, the Association of Federated
>>>> Organizations is deregistered as a player. This rule then repeals itself.
>>>>
>>>>     Dependency: Association of Federated Organizations is a player.
>>>> }}
>>>>         
>>> A Dependency must be another proposal.
>>>       
>> And the self-repeal is unnecessary, since you're not creating a rule.
>> If passed, this proposal would just modify the gamestate such that AFO
>> was deregistered.
>> --
>> Geoffrey Spear
>> http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>   
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss