Mike McGann on Sun, 25 Nov 2007 03:55:04 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Undead, and other legal fictions |
Yeah, what BobTHJ and Wooble said. And I think you should just remove the "This rule then repeals itself" as well since that would just cause all kinds of consultations. - Hose On Nov 24, 2007 3:54 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Nov 23, 2007 3:10 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Nov 23, 2007 12:02 PM, 0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > {{ > > > Upon passage of this proposal, the Association of Federated > > > Organizations is deregistered as a player. This rule then repeals itself. > > > > > > Dependency: Association of Federated Organizations is a player. > > > }} > > > > A Dependency must be another proposal. > > And the self-repeal is unnecessary, since you're not creating a rule. > If passed, this proposal would just modify the gamestate such that AFO > was deregistered. > -- > Geoffrey Spear > http://www.geoffreyspear.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss