Mike McGann on Sun, 25 Nov 2007 03:55:04 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Undead, and other legal fictions


Yeah, what BobTHJ and Wooble said. And I think you should just remove
the "This rule then repeals itself" as well since that would just
cause all kinds of consultations.

- Hose

On Nov 24, 2007 3:54 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2007 3:10 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Nov 23, 2007 12:02 PM, 0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > {{
> > >     Upon passage of this proposal, the Association of Federated
> > > Organizations is deregistered as a player. This rule then repeals itself.
> > >
> > >     Dependency: Association of Federated Organizations is a player.
> > > }}
> >
> > A Dependency must be another proposal.
>
> And the self-repeal is unnecessary, since you're not creating a rule.
> If passed, this proposal would just modify the gamestate such that AFO
> was deregistered.
> --
> Geoffrey Spear
> http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss