Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hmmm... another consultation

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 23, 2007 8:27 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 8:31 AM, 0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > {{
> >     Question:
> >        In B Nomic, does explicit consent to being governed by an
> > Agreement have to take place within B Nomic?
> >
> >     Reasoning:
> >        Giving explicit consent to being governed by an Agreement is a
> > Game Action, per a straight forward reading of Rule 1-10. Game Actions
> > must be posted to a Public Forum. B Nomic rules do not seem to recognize
> > outside public fora.
> > }}
>
> I answer Consultation 40 No.
>
> Rule 5-1 explicitly allows Agreements that are not intended to comply
> with B's rules to be accepted as valid; it would be outside the spirit
> of the rules to require such agreements to be joined by a Game Action.
>
> Indeed, 5-2's text definitely suggests that Agreements which are not
> Factions are outside the game.  Both non-Faction Agreements and
> Factions are bound solely by their own internal mechanisms for
> deciding their membership and conducting any business that doesn't
> directly involve game actions within B.
>
> --Priest Wooble
> --
> Geoffrey Spear
> http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss