Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39

Roger Hicks on Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:37:43 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39
From: "Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:37:37 -0700
In-reply-to: <200711222032.57403.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <6d741b990711221332s6ffcfbb7x3f36012de9d96c3b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650711221914g3e569e1cl315e3e9586a1c264@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0711221927r68c66f45t31b9f16adcdd8c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200711222032.57403.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>

On Nov 22, 2007 8:32 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I have submitted the exact same consultation, except with more arguments.

Sorry, I must have missed it.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39
  - From: Josiah Worcester

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Registration, consultation, proposal
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread