Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39

[0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Can this consultation be answered until my consultation has been? 
Doesn't whether or not it is a faction hinge partly on whether or not 
people can declare themselves a party to the agreement outside of b.nomic?

--
0x4461736864617368;



Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2007 8:14 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> Interesting. I'm not sure how to do it, but if we decide to allow
>> non-singular-humans to gain playerhood, we might need some way of *not*
>> allowing them to play simultaneously as both a player and a faction...
>> Perhaps eliminate the concept of a faction altogether?
>>
>> Billy Pilgrim
>>
>>     
> It appears the AFO is both a Player and a Faction. I submit the
> following consutation:
> {
> The AFO is both a Player and a Faction at the same time, true or false?
> }
>
> If this is true, then each Ballotday, the AFO's vote power is set to 1
> (or 0 if they give allegience), and at the beginning of each nweek,
> it's vote power is set to 3/4 of it's previous value. Also, players
> may give allegiance to the AFO.
>
> BobTHJ
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>   
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss