Re: [s-d] [s-b] Concerning the AFO.

Ed Murphy on Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:02:53 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Concerning the AFO.

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Concerning the AFO.
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:00:34 -0800
In-reply-to: <200711221454.24072.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <200711221454.24072.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

pikhq wrote:

> It seems that in agora-discussion, I had one person support me joining the 
> AFO, and two people with conditional support for the same. . . The conditions 
> have been met, so I am a member of the AFO.

This is correct; I missed that comex had supported it (it was worded as
"I support the triply-quoted intent" and appeared in the midst of some
other stuff not related to the AFO).

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Registration, consultation, proposal
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Surrender
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread