Re: [s-d] [s-b] Registration, consultation, proposal

[comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 22, 2007 6:20 PM, Kerim Aydin <kerim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You don't.  But that's not what the AFO is claiming.  The AFO's agents
> are claiming that, by having the AFO serve as an intermediate between
> its agents and non-agents, the AFO is itself is somehow itself sending and
> receiving messages. But it is no more the original sender or receiver
> than are any of the mail routers shown on my mail headers.  (Now that
> the consultation is delivered, I'm tempted to pick one of those on my
> header pathway and register it on the grounds that it is proven to both
> receive and send... But I'm new here so I don't want to be pushy :) ).
The fact that the AFO is acting on behalf of its agents is irrelevant.
 That the AFO acts in the legislated way, I think, is undisputable.
When the AFO is actually sending the email, it is its agents that
(like the mail routers) are going between itself and the non-agents.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss