Kerim Aydin on Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:58:09 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39


On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Mike McGann wrote:
> Since it only has to actually pass one of these, it can pass with #3
> quite easily. If the AFO states an email address to use for
> communication, and it responds to all email sent to that address, it
> cannot be shown that it fails #3.

The fact that "the AFO" sends and receives email is a legal fiction.
Its agents receive email funneled through a certain location.  Its
agents are a collective of other individuals, some of whom are also
players.  It is of course all right to allow B-nomic to believe in this
legal fiction that its agents created (by definining within the 
contract itself what it means for "the AFO" to receive or send mail).
But don't mistake it for what it isn't.

-Goethe



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss