Kerim Aydin on Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:58:09 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39 |
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Mike McGann wrote: > Since it only has to actually pass one of these, it can pass with #3 > quite easily. If the AFO states an email address to use for > communication, and it responds to all email sent to that address, it > cannot be shown that it fails #3. The fact that "the AFO" sends and receives email is a legal fiction. Its agents receive email funneled through a certain location. Its agents are a collective of other individuals, some of whom are also players. It is of course all right to allow B-nomic to believe in this legal fiction that its agents created (by definining within the contract itself what it means for "the AFO" to receive or send mail). But don't mistake it for what it isn't. -Goethe _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss