Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:14:25 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] voting results for nweek 133 |
Hey. Thanks for the extra points but there's one little correction I see to my scoring. Proposal 176 was dependent on 173, which failed, therefore proposal 176 was initially won but ends up lost after dependency culling. Therefore I get a point per vote for, not two because it did not pass. I lost 6 points :-( Thanks, Billy Pilgrim On Nov 19, 2007 1:57 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Apparently these were tabulated and never posted anywhere, since the > MoL managed to update the rules correctly, but here they are > retabulated and formatted: > > Voting results for nweek 133 > > 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 176 177 178 179 pts > --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- > Aaron C (was Zach) F A F F F F A F A F F F 12 > Charles F A A F F F F F F - F F 11 > Hose F A A F F F A F F F F F 12 > Billy Pilgrim F F A F F F A F F F F F 12 > comex - - - - - - F - - - - - 1 > Anything McGee A A F F F A A A A F A A 12 > BobTHJ F - - - F A F F - - F - 6 > Wooble A A A F A A F A F A F F 12 > 0x4461736864617368 F F A A F F A F F F F F 12 > Wonko A A A F F F A A F A F F 12 > > > FOR 6 2 2 7 8 6 4 6 6 5 8 7 > AGAINST 3 6 6 1 1 3 6 3 2 2 1 1 > STRENGTH 3 -4 -4 6 7 3 -2 3 4 3 7 6 > > Pass? Y N N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y > Score 12 -3 -3 14 16 12 -3 12 12 10 16 14 > > old score voting proposals new score old m > salary new m > --------- ------ --------- --------- ----- > ------ ----- > Aaron C (was Zach) 46 12 0 58 50 > 0 50 > Charles 16 11 0 27 50 > 0 50 > Hose 27 12 70 109 90 > 50 140 > Billy Pilgrim 33 12 26 71 60 > 50 110 > comex 0 1 -3 -2 320 > 0 320 > Anything McGee 24 12 -3 33 50 > 0 50 > BobTHJ 87 6 16 99 50 > 50 100 > Wooble 150 12 0 162 100 > 0 100 > 0x4461736864617368 7 12 9 28 50 > 50 100 > Wonko 48 12 0 60 50 > 0 50 > > -MoC Wooble > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss