Daniel Lepage on Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:04:14 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] My votes (finally!) |
It's possible for a proposal to order someone to take an action, but it's impossible for a proposal to *force* someone to take an action, any more than a proposal to stop the sun would force the sun to stop. A proposal can request that a player take an action, and can offer in- game incentive (i.e. giving/taking points), but by itself a proposal that just says "Player X will do Y" is meaningless. One could even argue that it's not a proposal, since by definition a proposal is a list of changes *to the gamestate* and, for example, the Agoran forums are not part of our gamestate. -- Wonko On Nov 14, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I don't think it's necessary to use a self-repealing rule; it should > in principle be possible for a passed proposal to order someone to > take an action. > > I'm on the fence about whether p177 should be interpreted to create an > obligation. Not only could the wording itself be a problem, but > there's also the issue that proposals take effect at an instant when, > IMO, all offices are vacant. There is no Ambassador at the instant > the proposal's effects happen, so ordering the Ambassador to do > something might be impossible. > > Of course, we could use common sense and make the incoming Ambassador > take any actions demanded of the office while it was vacant, but it's > probably best for such a mechanism to be explicit. > > On Nov 14, 2007 11:44 AM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Nov 14, 2007 11:29 AM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> 177: Proper Notification (Hose) >>> Against. Proposals that use "shall" like this have no effect. >> >> Are you saying that since it doesn't change any game state, the net >> result of this passing would be nothing? I guess the correct way >> would >> have been to create a rule that self-repealed after doing what was >> intended? But then again, I don't think there is anything preventing >> the Ambassador from doing it anyway. >> >> - Hose >> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-discuss mailing list >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >> > > > > -- > Geoffrey Spear > http://www.geoffreyspear.com/ > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss