Daniel Lepage on Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:56:50 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Proposal: Vested Interests

On Nov 13, 2007, at 4:34 PM, comex wrote:

> On Monday 12 November 2007, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
>> Hose's first objection is killer. I can't find any way around it. I
>> withdraw Proposal 175.
> Using a script would be a good way to provide a paper trail.  As  
> long as
> the maintainer of the script wasn't a complete jerk who modified the
> records, there are no problems with secrecy.  Even then, legislate  
> it so
> that the version announced to the Public Forum is authoritative, so
> problems would not result in paradoxes.  Require all players to  
> actively
> look up whether they are DA, Apologist, or neither, so that they can't
> really complain when they haven't.

A script could also require the selected players to confirm that they  
got the message, either by email or by webform.

Also, I think we're all good people - I trust everyone here not to  
cheat like that. Many interesting things are only possible if we  
assume that we can trust players not to destroy the game out of spite.


spoon-discuss mailing list