Daniel Lepage on Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:56:50 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Proposal: Vested Interests |
On Nov 13, 2007, at 4:34 PM, comex wrote: > On Monday 12 November 2007, Jamie Dallaire wrote: >> Hose's first objection is killer. I can't find any way around it. I >> withdraw Proposal 175. > > Using a script would be a good way to provide a paper trail. As > long as > the maintainer of the script wasn't a complete jerk who modified the > records, there are no problems with secrecy. Even then, legislate > it so > that the version announced to the Public Forum is authoritative, so > problems would not result in paradoxes. Require all players to > actively > look up whether they are DA, Apologist, or neither, so that they can't > really complain when they haven't. A script could also require the selected players to confirm that they got the message, either by email or by webform. Also, I think we're all good people - I trust everyone here not to cheat like that. Many interesting things are only possible if we assume that we can trust players not to destroy the game out of spite. -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss