Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?

Eugene Meidinger on Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:27:21 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?
From: Eugene Meidinger <eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:22:36 -0400
In-reply-to: <cf0c2a990709021719m580114b8m3e1cd75ff8abd70b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <cf0c2a990708300723g234a40d2v8c8d67ad394d84f7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1188754330.12092.8.camel@eugene-laptop> <cf0c2a990709021719m580114b8m3e1cd75ff8abd70b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Heh, make a boulder that I can't lift? A tempting idea simply for it's
implications.

On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 20:19 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Yes.  You can also institute rules making it illegal to repeal your omnipotence.
> 


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?
  - From: Eugene Meidinger
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread