Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?

Eugene Meidinger on Sun, 2 Sep 2007 10:32:17 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?
From: Eugene Meidinger <eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:32:10 -0400
In-reply-to: <cf0c2a990708300723g234a40d2v8c8d67ad394d84f7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <cf0c2a990708300723g234a40d2v8c8d67ad394d84f7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Technically speaking, couldn't I snap my fingers, go "Oh no you
DIDN"T!", and unexists that proposal?

Not that I intend to. one nweek of omnipotence is more than enough.




On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 10:23 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I submit the following Proposal, entitled "Et Tu, Brute?"
> 
> {{
> Repeal Rule 0-1.
> }}
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Et Tu, Brute?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread