Geoffrey Spear on Wed, 8 Aug 2007 18:06:37 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: de-Spivakify Ruleset |
On 8/8/07, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If precedent is all we need to legitimatize a system, then what's > wrong with Spivak? We've been using it for almost 6 years, and it's a > well-established standard in a number of other Nomics as well. Why not just write the entire Ruleset in Esperanto? I think precedent going back to the great writers at the dawn of the modern English language probably deserves a bit more respect than something some guy came up with a few years ago and which was adopted on a few nomics. -- Geoffrey Spear http://www.geoffreyspear.com/ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss