Geoffrey Spear on Fri, 3 Aug 2007 06:03:05 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] spoon-business Digest, Vol 43, Issue 20 |
On 8/3/07, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ted Ofner wrote: > > Consultation 27: TRUE > > Consultation 28: FALSE > > As much as I wish the opposite were true, I claim these consultations to > be inconsistent. We've pretty much established Primo as a Player and not > as a Faction, and my props that try to remove it as a player haven't > passed. While I'd be happy for something to change Primo to be a Faction > instead of a Player, a Consultation with justification of "it looks like > one" isn't the way to do it. Both of these Consultations were Answered more than 3 ndays ago, so under Rule 2-5 these claims are ineffective. -- Geoffrey Spear http://www.geoffreyspear.com/ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss