Geoffrey Spear on Fri, 3 Aug 2007 06:03:05 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] spoon-business Digest, Vol 43, Issue 20


On 8/3/07, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ted Ofner wrote:
> > Consultation 27: TRUE
> > Consultation 28: FALSE
>
> As much as I wish the opposite were true, I claim these consultations to
> be inconsistent. We've pretty much established Primo as a Player and not
> as a Faction, and my props that try to remove it as a player haven't
> passed. While I'd be happy for something to change Primo to be a Faction
> instead of a Player, a Consultation with justification of "it looks like
> one" isn't the way to do it.

Both of these Consultations were Answered more than 3 ndays ago, so
under Rule 2-5 these claims are ineffective.

-- 
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss