Re: [s-d] proosal: objecting made public

[comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 24 July 2007, Antonio Dolcetta wrote:
> Daniel Lepage wrote:
> > On 7/24/07, Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> title: objecting made public
> >> [[ Objections must be public to work ]]
> >>
> >> in Rule 6-4: Usurping Ministries,
> >> amend {
> >> Players other than the current Minister of that Ministry have until
> >> the second time midnight UTC occurs afterward to Object to that
> >> action. }
> >> to read:
> >> {
> >> Players other than the current Minister of that Ministry have until
> >> the second time midnight UTC occurs afterward to Object to that
> >> action on a Public Forum.
> >> }
> >
> > Isn't Objecting a Game Action, and therefore required to be on a
> > Public Forum anyway?
>
> The only "definition" of Objecting, is in the tidiness rules. There it's
> something you can perform as a game action.
>
> Any player may as a Game Action Object to a Tidiness List, in this case
> the Tidiness List is discarded, and has no effect.
>
> when I started writing this proposal I wanted to make a formal
> definition of Objecting so that we could use it for other things too, so
> I went and looked at agora's version.
> They have a very thorough and complete definition, that is also some 2
> pages long.
> Since I didn't want to outright copy that, and I don't think I can write
> a new version that is short and effective and still at least as good as
> that one, I chickened out.
>

At least say "as a Game Action", not "to a Public Forum".

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss