Geoffrey Spear on Thu, 19 Jul 2007 07:28:36 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] repeal monopoly

We might want to closely examine the entire ruleset to look for things
that aren't specifically forbidden that could be abused before we pass
this one.  For example, the rules define ways that a Player may gain
points but don't, as far as I see with a quick glance, actually forbid
a Player from gaining points in other ways (e.g., by simply declaring
that e has gained X points).

I'd argue that the Monopoly Rule would never need to be explicitly
invoked as it's implicitly invoked whenever someone is accused of
doing something in a way that's contrary to the rules.

On 7/19/07, Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [[since we've never actually invoked it, not even in the Primo
> Corporation incident (where it would not have helped anyway), we might
> want to get rid of this]]
> I propose:
> title: repeal monopoly
> {
> repeal rule 1-15
> }
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx

Geoffrey Spear
spoon-discuss mailing list