Daniel Lepage on Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:49:54 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] oracle report 27/06/07 (nday 3) |
> > Consultation 21 > > Supplicant: Wonko > > > > {{ > > Question: Humans cannot join B Nomic. True or False? > > }} > > > > Assigned to: Primo Corporation > > Well, if that were the case, I at least would still be a player I think, > since I've been a player since toward the end of the First Era and the > statute of limitations rule was still there. We ought to bring back a > statute of limitations rule, although it may require us to better define > Public Displays first. > > However, I think that we still do have players. A Turing Test has three > participants: two humans and a machine. The machine passes if the testing > human can't determine which is the machine and which is the other human. > The testing human passes if they can. And I suppose the tested human > passes if they can as well. In any event, for any of the human roles in > there, any of the people whom we've been calling players here do, in > theory, have the ability to pass at least one Turing test, if only by pure > chance. The two humans are just part of the test. The test is to determine whether the machine can pretend to be a person. The judge or the human conversationalist doesn't "pass" the turing test any more than the proctor of a school exam "passes" the exam, or the driving instructor giving a driving test "passes" that. That said, we have enough argument about the Turing Test that you could probably get away with defining it however you want. At least, Primo seems to have done so, and they're not even eligible to be the proctor of a Turing Test. The problem with the Statute of Limitations is that it broke all kinds of things whenever somebody made a mistake. Originally it was "any action, after 10 ndays, becomes retroactively legal unless somebody objects", and Uin nearly repealed rule 10 by sticking "I repeal rule 10!" in his signature. -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss