Antonio Dolcetta on Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:13:32 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] consultation 17 |
Roger Hicks wrote: > On 6/22/07, Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Roger Hicks wrote: >>> In legal >>> contexts, an organization formed by a binding agreement of its members >>> it treated as a separate legal person with its own collective rights >>> and responsibilities. Translated into B Nomic terms, such an >>> organization constitutes an External Force distinct from the External >>> Forces that comprise its membership. >> Legal context changes when you change ruleset, B Nomic does not >> understand "Binding Agreement". > > I was referring to Legal contexts (note the s) in general, not Agora's > specific context. I wasn't trying to port a concept over from another > ruleset, merely acknowledge a generalization that occurs frequently > under many governing systems, including most every nationality. This > was the same premise that allowed Pineapple Partnership to register in > Agora even though Agora did not have any means of recogizing a > multi-person organization in its ruleset (at the time anyway). > Sorry if I stress this point, Agora did at the time have "binding agreements" and that was the basis of the Pinapple Partnership B does not contain this concept, from B's perspective Primo is just a group of people. It's charter has no worth or meaning to B. And this is a problem if there are players that are at the same time independent players and members of Primo. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss