Re: [s-d] [s-b] 116.2 Administrator's Update

shadowfirebird on Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:32:16 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] 116.2 Administrator's Update

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 116.2 Administrator's Update
From: shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:32:11 +0000
In-reply-to: <45BF7558.8000206@xxxxxxx>
References: <ulkjlmfj2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45BF6FCF.70103@xxxxxxxxx> <45BF7558.8000206@xxxxxxx>

I'm for that.  Otherwise eventually the ruleset is going to be very
difficult to read - you will have to leaf through hundreds of
consultations.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 116.2 Administrator's Update
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 116.2 Administrator's Update
  - From: bd

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 116.2 Administrator's Update
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] 116.2 Administrator's Update
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 116.2 Administrator's Update
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] 116.2 Administrator's Update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread