bd on Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:45:01 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] 116.2 Administrator's Update |
Antonio Dolcetta wrote: > Peter Cooper Jr. wrote: > >> - One thing I do know is that Antonio's prop to become Oracle passed, >> so I'm passing all that stuff off to him. I started putting up >> Consultations 1 and 2 on the wiki, since those were asked and >> answered while I was still Oracle. > > I was wondering: it would be cool to add to the wiki representation of > each rule that was somehow involved in a Consultation some noted > pointing to the consultation. > Do you think I can do that ? > I was wandering what's the best way to do that from a formal point of > view. Simply adding some /* */ delimited text, which would be the > easiest solution might be interpreted as trying to modify the rule > itself... > > What do you think ? I read through the Agora ruleset the other day, and it seems they have a system where a Judge ruling on a CFJ can Order that an annotation be attached to a rule directing how it is to be interpreted... perhaps we could do something similar with the Oracle? _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss