Re: [s-d] [s-b] proposal: don't give points for proposals anymore

[Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>]

shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> [[since we now have an alternate way of generating points (rule-tag),
>> points for proposals is not needed anymore, and more importantly people
>> are voting down perfectly good proposals just because they give points !!!]]
> 

> Let me put in a word for the other point of view here, because I like
> the whole points-for-proposals thing.

I like it too, but I dislike getting voted down just because I would get 
points more than I like getting the points themselves.

> 
> First, I've started making more proposals, and I've started trying to
> make those proposals as appealing to the other players as I can.  That
> has to be good for the game.

it was that way before too, or at least it should have been, why else 
would you play nomic ?

> 
> At voting time I feel a strong urge to vote against any proposal that
> doesn't add something to the game or fix something that really needs
> to be fixed.  Surely that has to be good for the game, too.

You mean you pass specific one-time typo fixing stuff, and down general 
every-time-it's-needed typo fixing stuff, because that's not useful ?
Where do you draw the line, suppose a player has 99 points and makes a 
really good and fundamentally useful proposal, first player to 100 wins, 
do you pass it or not ?

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss