Re: [s-d] [s-b] Piracy

Daniel Lepage on Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:46:17 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Piracy

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Piracy
From: Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:46:09 -0500
In-reply-to: <2f4350400701190943h337e16a4l548cfd46a0b9789b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <86F3026B-B290-450D-80B5-E9226ED50C1F@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45B0FF73.5090401@xxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400701190943h337e16a4l548cfd46a0b9789b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:43 PM, shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Just have pirates as RTOs.

But that would defeat the self-referentiality of it. To be honest,  
the only reason I made that proposal is because I wanted a rule that  
started with "A Pirate Rule is any rule that mentions Pirate Rules"

> Wonko seems to be moving towards having RTOs that can walk around and
> act a bit like players.

Well, the Pirate rules aren't RTOs, they're actually rules  
themselves. However, I may shortly propose having them move about, as  
Antonio's post gave me an idea...

-- 
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Piracy
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Piracy
  - From: shadowfirebird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 115.9 Administrator's Update; Voting Starts
Next by Date: [s-d] proposal parser
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Piracy
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Player Request
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread