Re: [s-d] [s-b] Virtual particles

shadowfirebird on Mon, 11 Dec 2006 05:42:38 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Virtual particles

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Virtual particles
From: shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:42:31 +0000
In-reply-to: <457CC78B.4050209@xxxxxxx>
References: <457CC78B.4050209@xxxxxxx>

Isn't this functionally identical with allowing negative points?  Or
am I missing something?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] Virtual particles
  - From: Peter Cooper Jr.

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo (now with more drama!)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Virtual particles
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo (now with more drama!)
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] Virtual particles
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread